Caterpillar D6C SA vs Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Caterpillar D6C SA is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400: 140 HP versus 139 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The Caterpillar D6C SA is the more recent model: production started in 1970, versus 1969 for the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400.
Full specs comparison
| Caterpillar D6C SA | Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 139 HP |
| Production years | 1970–1976 | 1969–1970 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 10.5 L | 8.3 L |
| Weight | — | 7 847 kg |
| Drive | — | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 6 / 4 | 10 / 2 |
| Wheelbase | — | 304 cm |
| Length | — | 594 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Caterpillar D6C SA or the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400?
The Caterpillar D6C SA is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400: 140 HP versus 139 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the Caterpillar D6C SA or the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400?
The Caterpillar D6C SA is the more recent model: production started in 1970, versus 1969 for the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400.