M-R-S A-80B vs Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The M-R-S A-80B is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400: 141 HP versus 139 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
- The Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 is the more recent model: production started in 1969, versus 1967 for the M-R-S A-80B.
- The Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 is heavier: 7847 kg versus 7711 kg for the M-R-S A-80B.
Full specs comparison
| M-R-S A-80B | Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 141 HP | 139 HP |
| Production years | 1967–1980 | 1969–1970 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement | 4.6 L | 8.3 L |
| Weight | 7 711 kg | 7 847 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 20 / 4 | 10 / 2 |
| Wheelbase | 299 cm | 304 cm |
| Length | 495 cm | 594 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the M-R-S A-80B or the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400?
The M-R-S A-80B is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400: 141 HP versus 139 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the M-R-S A-80B or the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400?
The Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 is the more recent model: production started in 1969, versus 1967 for the M-R-S A-80B.
Which is heavier, the M-R-S A-80B or the Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400?
The Minneapolis-Moline A4T-1400 is heavier: 7847 kg versus 7711 kg for the M-R-S A-80B.