Challenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 660
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT495D and the Massey Ferguson 660 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
- The Challenger MT495D is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2003 for the Massey Ferguson 660.
- The Massey Ferguson 660 is heavier: 6000 kg versus 5670 kg for the Challenger MT495D.
- The Challenger MT495D offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5171 kg versus 4500 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT495D | Massey Ferguson 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Production years | 2014–2016 | 2003–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 5 670 kg | 6 000 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 12 / 5 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 171 kg | 4 500 kg |
| Wheelbase | 266 cm | 294 cm |
| Length | — | 485 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT495D or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495D and the Massey Ferguson 660 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT495D or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495D is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2003 for the Massey Ferguson 660.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT495D or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Massey Ferguson 660 is heavier: 6000 kg versus 5670 kg for the Challenger MT495D.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT495D or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495D offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5171 kg versus 4500 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT120 vs Massey Ferguson 660AGCO RT135 vs Massey Ferguson 660CaseIH CVX 150 vs Massey Ferguson 660Challenger MT495D vs John Deere 6150MChallenger MT495D vs John Deere 6150RChallenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 7150Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 vs Massey Ferguson 660