Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 660
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT495E and the Massey Ferguson 660 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
- The Challenger MT495E is the more recent model: production started in 2017, versus 2003 for the Massey Ferguson 660.
- The Challenger MT495E is heavier: 6999 kg versus 6000 kg for the Massey Ferguson 660.
- The Challenger MT495E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5100 kg versus 4500 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT495E | Massey Ferguson 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Production years | 2017–2020 | 2003–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 6 999 kg | 6 000 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 12 / 5 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 100 kg | 4 500 kg |
| Wheelbase | 266 cm | 294 cm |
| Length | — | 485 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495E and the Massey Ferguson 660 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495E is the more recent model: production started in 2017, versus 2003 for the Massey Ferguson 660.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495E is heavier: 6999 kg versus 6000 kg for the Massey Ferguson 660.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 660?
The Challenger MT495E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5100 kg versus 4500 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT120 vs Massey Ferguson 660AGCO RT135 vs Massey Ferguson 660CaseIH CVX 150 vs Massey Ferguson 660Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 6716SChallenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7150Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7716Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7716SDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 vs Massey Ferguson 660