Challenger MT675C vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT675C and the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320 deliver the same power: 320 HP.
- The Challenger MT675C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1974 for the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320.
- The Challenger MT675C is heavier: 10999 kg versus 10886 kg for the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT675C | Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 HP | 320 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 1974–1976 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 |
| Displacement | 8.4 L | 14.8 L |
| Weight | 10 999 kg | 10 886 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 10 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 12 002 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 310 cm | 308 cm |
| Length | 566 cm | 619 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT675C or the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320?
The Challenger MT675C and the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320 deliver the same power: 320 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT675C or the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320?
The Challenger MT675C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1974 for the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT675C or the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320?
The Challenger MT675C is heavier: 10999 kg versus 10886 kg for the Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320.
Other comparisons
AGCO DT275B vs Challenger MT675CBig Bud HN350 vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Big Bud KT350 vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Challenger MT675C vs Fendt 933 VarioChallenger MT675C vs John Deere 9230Challenger MT675C vs New Holland T8050Knudson 360 vs Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320Steiger Turbo Tiger II ST-320 vs woods-&-copeland 320c