Challenger MT765 vs Versatile 305
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT765 is more powerful than the Versatile 305: 306 HP versus 305 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
- The Versatile 305 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the Challenger MT765.
- The Challenger MT765 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7257 kg versus 6804 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT765 | Versatile 305 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 HP | 305 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2004 | 2012–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 8.8 L | 8.3 L |
| Weight | — | 8 686 kg |
| Drive | — | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 4 | 16 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 7 257 kg | 6 804 kg |
| Wheelbase | — | 307 cm |
| Length | — | 508 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT765 or the Versatile 305?
The Challenger MT765 is more powerful than the Versatile 305: 306 HP versus 305 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT765 or the Versatile 305?
The Versatile 305 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the Challenger MT765.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT765 or the Versatile 305?
The Challenger MT765 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7257 kg versus 6804 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO DT275B vs Challenger MT765CBuhler Versatile 305 vs John Deere 8330TBuhler Versatile 305 vs Massey Ferguson 8680Buhler Versatile 305 vs Müller sta310Buhler Versatile 305 vs Valtra S322CaseIH Magnum 380 vs Challenger MT765ECaseIH Steiger 350 Rowtrac vs Challenger MT765DCaseIH Steiger 350 vs Challenger MT765D