International Harvester 826 vs McCormick Intl CX105
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The International Harvester 826 and the McCormick Intl CX105 deliver the same power: 102 HP.
- The McCormick Intl CX105 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 1969 for the International Harvester 826.
- The International Harvester 826 is heavier: 4472 kg versus 3755 kg for the McCormick Intl CX105.
Full specs comparison
| International Harvester 826 | McCormick Intl CX105 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 102 HP | 102 HP |
| Production years | 1969–1971 | 2003–2007 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | 4 472 kg | 3 755 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 8 | 16 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | — | 3 875 kg |
| Wheelbase | 266 cm | 235 cm |
| Length | — | 421 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the International Harvester 826 or the McCormick Intl CX105?
The International Harvester 826 and the McCormick Intl CX105 deliver the same power: 102 HP.
Which is more recent, the International Harvester 826 or the McCormick Intl CX105?
The McCormick Intl CX105 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 1969 for the International Harvester 826.
Which is heavier, the International Harvester 826 or the McCormick Intl CX105?
The International Harvester 826 is heavier: 4472 kg versus 3755 kg for the McCormick Intl CX105.
Other comparisons
Claas 456 vs McCormick Intl CX105Cockshutt 1855 vs International Harvester 826Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 106 MK3 vs McCormick Intl CX105Farmall 826 vs International Harvester 826International Harvester 826 vs Minneapolis-Moline G940International Harvester 826 vs Wagner WA-4McCormick Intl CX105 vs SAME Silver 105McCormick Intl CX105 vs Valtra N92