Kubota M4900 vs McCormick Intl C50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Kubota M4900 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl C50: 54 HP versus 53 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
- The Kubota M4900 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1905 kg versus 1661 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Kubota M4900 | McCormick Intl C50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 54 HP | 53 HP |
| Production years | 2001–2008 | 2001–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 5 | 3 |
| Displacement | 2.7 L | 2.7 L |
| Weight | — | 2 420 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 8 / 4 | 8 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 905 kg | 1 661 kg |
| Wheelbase | 199 cm | — |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Kubota M4900 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The Kubota M4900 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl C50: 54 HP versus 53 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Kubota M4900 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The Kubota M4900 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1905 kg versus 1661 kg.

