Long 530 vs McCormick Intl C50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Long 530 and the McCormick Intl C50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.
- The McCormick Intl C50 is the more recent model: production started in 2001, versus 1999 for the Long 530.
- The McCormick Intl C50 is heavier: 2420 kg versus 2091 kg for the Long 530.
- The McCormick Intl C50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1661 kg versus 1349 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Long 530 | McCormick Intl C50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Production years | 1999–2001 | 2001–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 2.7 L |
| Weight | 2 091 kg | 2 420 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 8 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 349 kg | 1 661 kg |
| Wheelbase | 195 cm | — |
| Length | 347 cm | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Long 530 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The Long 530 and the McCormick Intl C50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.
Which is more recent, the Long 530 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The McCormick Intl C50 is the more recent model: production started in 2001, versus 1999 for the Long 530.
Which is heavier, the Long 530 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The McCormick Intl C50 is heavier: 2420 kg versus 2091 kg for the Long 530.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Long 530 or the McCormick Intl C50?
The McCormick Intl C50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1661 kg versus 1349 kg.