LS i3040H vs Montana 3940
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Montana 3940 is more powerful than the LS i3040H: 39 HP versus 38 HP (+1 HP, +3%).
- The LS i3040H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2004 for the Montana 3940.
- The Montana 3940 is heavier: 1340 kg versus 1261 kg for the LS i3040H.
- The Montana 3940 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1222 kg versus 820 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS i3040H | Montana 3940 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 38 HP | 39 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2004–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1.8 L | 1.8 L |
| Weight | 1 261 kg | 1 340 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Rear lift capacity | 820 kg | 1 222 kg |
| Wheelbase | 166 cm | 168 cm |
| Length | 298 cm | 335 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS i3040H or the Montana 3940?
The Montana 3940 is more powerful than the LS i3040H: 39 HP versus 38 HP (+1 HP, +3%).
Which is more recent, the LS i3040H or the Montana 3940?
The LS i3040H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2004 for the Montana 3940.
Which is heavier, the LS i3040H or the Montana 3940?
The Montana 3940 is heavier: 1340 kg versus 1261 kg for the LS i3040H.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS i3040H or the Montana 3940?
The Montana 3940 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1222 kg versus 820 kg.