LS i3040H vs McCormick Intl CT36
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The LS i3040H and the McCormick Intl CT36 deliver the same power: 38 HP.
- The LS i3040H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT36.
- The LS i3040H is heavier: 1261 kg versus 1229 kg for the McCormick Intl CT36.
- The McCormick Intl CT36 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 820 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS i3040H | McCormick Intl CT36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 38 HP | 38 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2007–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1.8 L | 1.8 L |
| Weight | 1 261 kg | 1 229 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 820 kg | 1 188 kg |
| Wheelbase | 166 cm | 165 cm |
| Length | 298 cm | 299 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS i3040H or the McCormick Intl CT36?
The LS i3040H and the McCormick Intl CT36 deliver the same power: 38 HP.
Which is more recent, the LS i3040H or the McCormick Intl CT36?
The LS i3040H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT36.
Which is heavier, the LS i3040H or the McCormick Intl CT36?
The LS i3040H is heavier: 1261 kg versus 1229 kg for the McCormick Intl CT36.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS i3040H or the McCormick Intl CT36?
The McCormick Intl CT36 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 820 kg.