LS R4020H vs McCormick Intl CT55U
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The LS R4020H and the McCormick Intl CT55U deliver the same power: 47 HP.
- The LS R4020H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT55U.
- The McCormick Intl CT55U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1729 kg for the LS R4020H.
- The McCormick Intl CT55U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1249 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS R4020H | McCormick Intl CT55U | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 47 HP | 47 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2008–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Weight | 1 729 kg | 2 270 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 249 kg | 1 496 kg |
| Wheelbase | 175 cm | 187 cm |
| Length | 335 cm | 317 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS R4020H or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The LS R4020H and the McCormick Intl CT55U deliver the same power: 47 HP.
Which is more recent, the LS R4020H or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The LS R4020H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT55U.
Which is heavier, the LS R4020H or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The McCormick Intl CT55U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1729 kg for the LS R4020H.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS R4020H or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The McCormick Intl CT55U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1249 kg.