LS U5020 vs McCormick Intl CT55U
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The LS U5020 and the McCormick Intl CT55U deliver the same power: 47 HP.
- The LS U5020 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT55U.
- The McCormick Intl CT55U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1941 kg for the LS U5020.
- The LS U5020 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1850 kg versus 1496 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS U5020 | McCormick Intl CT55U | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 47 HP | 47 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2019 | 2008–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.5 L |
| Weight | 1 941 kg | 2 270 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 850 kg | 1 496 kg |
| Wheelbase | 193 cm | 187 cm |
| Length | 343 cm | 317 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS U5020 or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The LS U5020 and the McCormick Intl CT55U deliver the same power: 47 HP.
Which is more recent, the LS U5020 or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The LS U5020 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT55U.
Which is heavier, the LS U5020 or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The McCormick Intl CT55U is heavier: 2270 kg versus 1941 kg for the LS U5020.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS U5020 or the McCormick Intl CT55U?
The LS U5020 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1850 kg versus 1496 kg.