Massey Ferguson 1525 vs Minneapolis-Moline RTU
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 1525 and the Minneapolis-Moline RTU deliver the same power: 25 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 1525 is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1939 for the Minneapolis-Moline RTU.
- The Minneapolis-Moline RTU is heavier: 1406 kg versus 850 kg for the Massey Ferguson 1525.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 1525 | Minneapolis-Moline RTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 25 HP | 25 HP |
| Production years | 2018–2024 | 1939–1954 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 2.7 L |
| Weight | 850 kg | 1 406 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 4 / 1 |
| Rear lift capacity | 600 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 155 cm | 193 cm |
| Length | 293 cm | 294 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 1525 or the Minneapolis-Moline RTU?
The Massey Ferguson 1525 and the Minneapolis-Moline RTU deliver the same power: 25 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 1525 or the Minneapolis-Moline RTU?
The Massey Ferguson 1525 is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1939 for the Minneapolis-Moline RTU.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 1525 or the Minneapolis-Moline RTU?
The Minneapolis-Moline RTU is heavier: 1406 kg versus 850 kg for the Massey Ferguson 1525.