Massey Ferguson 1754 vs McCormick Intl CX50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 1754 and the McCormick Intl CX50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 1754 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl CX50.
- The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 1880 kg for the Massey Ferguson 1754.
- The McCormick Intl CX50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2039 kg versus 1399 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 1754 | McCormick Intl CX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Production years | 2013–2018 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 2.2 L | 2.7 L |
| Weight | 1 880 kg | 3 235 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 16 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 399 kg | 2 039 kg |
| Wheelbase | 196 cm | 215 cm |
| Length | 336 cm | 406 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 1754 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The Massey Ferguson 1754 and the McCormick Intl CX50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 1754 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The Massey Ferguson 1754 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl CX50.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 1754 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 1880 kg for the Massey Ferguson 1754.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 1754 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The McCormick Intl CX50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2039 kg versus 1399 kg.
Other comparisons
Iseki TJ55 vs McCormick Intl CX50Kubota L5240 vs Massey Ferguson 1754Kubota M4900 vs McCormick Intl CX50Kubota M5140 vs Massey Ferguson 1754Kubota MX5100 vs Massey Ferguson 1754Landini Advantage 55F vs McCormick Intl CX50Long 530 vs McCormick Intl CX50Massey Ferguson 1754 vs New Holland Workmaster 50