Massey Ferguson 2706E vs McCormick Intl CT65U
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 2706E and the McCormick Intl CT65U deliver the same power: 57 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 2706E is the more recent model: production started in 2016, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT65U.
- The McCormick Intl CT65U is heavier: 2449 kg versus 1744 kg for the Massey Ferguson 2706E.
- The McCormick Intl CT65U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1750 kg versus 1099 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 2706E | McCormick Intl CT65U | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 57 HP | 57 HP |
| Production years | 2016–2019 | 2008–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.2 L | 3.3 L |
| Weight | 1 744 kg | 2 449 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 099 kg | 1 750 kg |
| Wheelbase | 198 cm | 198 cm |
| Length | 337 cm | 355 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 2706E or the McCormick Intl CT65U?
The Massey Ferguson 2706E and the McCormick Intl CT65U deliver the same power: 57 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 2706E or the McCormick Intl CT65U?
The Massey Ferguson 2706E is the more recent model: production started in 2016, versus 2008 for the McCormick Intl CT65U.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 2706E or the McCormick Intl CT65U?
The McCormick Intl CT65U is heavier: 2449 kg versus 1744 kg for the Massey Ferguson 2706E.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 2706E or the McCormick Intl CT65U?
The McCormick Intl CT65U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1750 kg versus 1099 kg.
Other comparisons
Erkunt Bereket 60E vs Massey Ferguson 2706EErkunt Kismet 55E Bahce vs Massey Ferguson 2706EErkunt Kismet 55E vs Massey Ferguson 2706EErkunt Kismet 58E vs Massey Ferguson 2706EMcCormick Intl CT65U vs Montana 5720McCormick Intl CT65U vs Montana 5740McCormick Intl CT65U vs Montana U5784McCormick Intl CT65U vs New Holland TN60A