Cub Cadet GT 2550 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet GT 2550: 64 HP versus 22 HP (+42 HP, +191%).
- The Cub Cadet GT 2550 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 381 kg for the Cub Cadet GT 2550.
- The Cub Cadet GT 2550 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet GT 2550 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 22 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2005–2010 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 381 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 119 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 182 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 50" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet GT 2550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet GT 2550: 64 HP versus 22 HP (+42 HP, +191%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet GT 2550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet GT 2550 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet GT 2550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 381 kg for the Cub Cadet GT 2550.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet GT 2550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet GT 2550 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".