Cub Cadet LGT 1050 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LGT 1050: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
- The Cub Cadet LGT 1050 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 248 kg for the Cub Cadet LGT 1050.
- The Cub Cadet LGT 1050 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet LGT 1050 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 25 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 248 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 120 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 175 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 50" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet LGT 1050 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LGT 1050: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet LGT 1050 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LGT 1050 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet LGT 1050 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 248 kg for the Cub Cadet LGT 1050.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet LGT 1050 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LGT 1050 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".