Cub Cadet LT1042 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT1042: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
- The Cub Cadet LT1042 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 225 kg for the Cub Cadet LT1042.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet LT1042 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 19 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2005–2008 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 225 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 116 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet LT1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT1042: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet LT1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LT1042 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet LT1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 225 kg for the Cub Cadet LT1042.