Cub Cadet SLT1550 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet SLT1550: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
- The Cub Cadet SLT1550 is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 248 kg for the Cub Cadet SLT1550.
- The Cub Cadet SLT1550 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet SLT1550 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 25 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2008 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 248 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 116 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 50" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet SLT1550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet SLT1550: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet SLT1550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet SLT1550 is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet SLT1550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 248 kg for the Cub Cadet SLT1550.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet SLT1550 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet SLT1550 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".