John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Wheel Horse C-195
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse C-195: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1982 for the Wheel Horse C-195.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 335 kg for the Wheel Horse C-195.
- The Wheel Horse C-195 has the wider mower deck: 48" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Wheel Horse C-195 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 19 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1982–1984 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 335 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | 133 cm |
| Length | 335 cm | 190 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 48" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse C-195?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse C-195: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse C-195?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1982 for the Wheel Horse C-195.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse C-195?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 335 kg for the Wheel Horse C-195.
Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse C-195?
The Wheel Horse C-195 has the wider mower deck: 48" versus 42".

