CaseIH Farmall 30B vs Challenger MT255
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the Challenger MT255 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Challenger MT255.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1019 kg for the Challenger MT255.
- The Challenger MT255 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 899 kg versus 819 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Farmall 30B | Challenger MT255 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 28 HP | 28 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2003–2005 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | 1 019 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 9 / 3 |
| Rear lift capacity | 819 kg | 899 kg |
| Wheelbase | 167 cm | 163 cm |
| Length | 302 cm | 295 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the Challenger MT255?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the Challenger MT255 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the Challenger MT255?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Challenger MT255.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the Challenger MT255?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1019 kg for the Challenger MT255.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the Challenger MT255?
The Challenger MT255 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 899 kg versus 819 kg.
Other comparisons
Branson 2800 vs CaseIH Farmall 30BCaseIH Farmall 30B vs Mitsubishi GA28CaseIH Farmall 30B vs New Holland Boomer 30CaseIH Farmall 30B vs Yanmar Ex2900Challenger MT255 vs Iseki TG293Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1428Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1429Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1528