CaseIH Farmall 30B vs McCormick Intl CT28
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the McCormick Intl CT28 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT28.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1199 kg for the McCormick Intl CT28.
- The McCormick Intl CT28 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 819 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Farmall 30B | McCormick Intl CT28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 28 HP | 28 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2007–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | 1 199 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 819 kg | 1 188 kg |
| Wheelbase | 167 cm | 165 cm |
| Length | 302 cm | 299 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the McCormick Intl CT28 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT28.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1199 kg for the McCormick Intl CT28.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The McCormick Intl CT28 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 819 kg.

