CaseIH JX1095N vs Challenger MT345B
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH JX1095N and the Challenger MT345B deliver the same power: 91 HP.
- The Challenger MT345B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2005 for the CaseIH JX1095N.
- The Challenger MT345B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2494 kg versus 1797 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH JX1095N | Challenger MT345B | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 91 HP | 91 HP |
| Production years | 2005–2008 | 2006–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 3.9 L | 3.3 L |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 797 kg | 2 494 kg |
| Wheelbase | 217 cm | 210 cm |
| Length | 401 cm | 375 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH JX1095N or the Challenger MT345B?
The CaseIH JX1095N and the Challenger MT345B deliver the same power: 91 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH JX1095N or the Challenger MT345B?
The Challenger MT345B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2005 for the CaseIH JX1095N.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH JX1095N or the Challenger MT345B?
The Challenger MT345B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2494 kg versus 1797 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH JX1095N vs John Deere 5525CaseIH JX1095N vs Massey Ferguson 3645CaseIH JX1095N vs McCormick Intl C95 MaxCaseIH JX1095N vs New Holland TL90AChallenger MT345B vs Landini Powerfarm 95Challenger MT345B vs McCormick Intl C95 MaxChallenger MT345B vs McCormick Intl T90Challenger MT345B vs New Holland TL90A