Challenger MT345B vs McCormick Intl C95 Max
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT345B and the McCormick Intl C95 Max deliver the same power: 91 HP.
- The Challenger MT345B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl C95 Max.
- The McCormick Intl C95 Max offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2600 kg versus 2494 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT345B | McCormick Intl C95 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 91 HP | 91 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2009 | 2004–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | — | 3 090 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 24 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 494 kg | 2 600 kg |
| Wheelbase | 210 cm | 234 cm |
| Length | 375 cm | 413 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |