CaseIH Puma 130 vs Cockshutt 2050
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 130 and the Cockshutt 2050 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 130 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1968 for the Cockshutt 2050.
- The Cockshutt 2050 is heavier: 6595 kg versus 6168 kg for the CaseIH Puma 130.
- The CaseIH Puma 130 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3583 kg versus 2721 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 130 | Cockshutt 2050 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 131 HP | 131 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1968–1969 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.8 L |
| Weight | 6 168 kg | 6 595 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 6 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 2 721 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 248 cm |
| Length | — | 412 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the Cockshutt 2050?
The CaseIH Puma 130 and the Cockshutt 2050 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the Cockshutt 2050?
The CaseIH Puma 130 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1968 for the Cockshutt 2050.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the Cockshutt 2050?
The Cockshutt 2050 is heavier: 6595 kg versus 6168 kg for the CaseIH Puma 130.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the Cockshutt 2050?
The CaseIH Puma 130 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3583 kg versus 2721 kg.