CaseIH Puma 130 vs McCormick Intl MTX135

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 130

CaseIH Puma 130

131 HP · 2011–2013

View full specs
McCormick Intl MTX135

McCormick Intl MTX135

131 HP · 2004–2007

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH Puma 130 and the McCormick Intl MTX135 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
  • The CaseIH Puma 130 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
  • The CaseIH Puma 130 is heavier: 6168 kg versus 6001 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
  • The McCormick Intl MTX135 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5871 kg versus 3583 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH Puma 130McCormick Intl MTX135
Power131 HP131 HP
Production years2011–20132004–2007
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement6.7 L6.8 L
Weight6 168 kg6 001 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionPower shiftPower shift
Gears (fwd/rev)18 / 616 / 12
Rear lift capacity3 583 kg5 871 kg
Wheelbase273 cm272 cm
Length—516 cm
CabYesYes

Other comparisons

CaseIH MXU130 Value vs McCormick Intl MTX135CaseIH Puma 130 vs Fendt 413 VarioCaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6.160CaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6060 EliteCaseIH Puma 130 vs Zetor Forterra 125Deutz-Fahr M610 vs McCormick Intl MTX135Fendt 712 Vario vs McCormick Intl MTX135Landini Landpower 135 vs McCormick Intl MTX135