CaseIH Puma 130 vs McCormick Intl MTX135
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 130 and the McCormick Intl MTX135 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 130 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
- The CaseIH Puma 130 is heavier: 6168 kg versus 6001 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
- The McCormick Intl MTX135 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5871 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 130 | McCormick Intl MTX135 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 131 HP | 131 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2004–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 6 168 kg | 6 001 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 5 871 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 272 cm |
| Length | — | 516 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl MTX135?
The CaseIH Puma 130 and the McCormick Intl MTX135 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl MTX135?
The CaseIH Puma 130 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl MTX135?
The CaseIH Puma 130 is heavier: 6168 kg versus 6001 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX135.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl MTX135?
The McCormick Intl MTX135 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5871 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH MXU130 Value vs McCormick Intl MTX135CaseIH Puma 130 vs Fendt 413 VarioCaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6.160CaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6060 EliteCaseIH Puma 130 vs Zetor Forterra 125Deutz-Fahr M610 vs McCormick Intl MTX135Fendt 712 Vario vs McCormick Intl MTX135Landini Landpower 135 vs McCormick Intl MTX135