CaseIH Puma 145 vs Claas 696
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 145 and the Claas 696 deliver the same power: 146 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 145 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2003 for the Claas 696.
- The Claas 696 is heavier: 6691 kg versus 6509 kg for the CaseIH Puma 145.
- The Claas 696 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8471 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 145 | Claas 696 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 146 HP | 146 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2003–2005 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 6 509 kg | 6 691 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 8 471 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 275 cm |
| Length | — | 472 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 145 or the Claas 696?
The CaseIH Puma 145 and the Claas 696 deliver the same power: 146 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 145 or the Claas 696?
The CaseIH Puma 145 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2003 for the Claas 696.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 145 or the Claas 696?
The Claas 696 is heavier: 6691 kg versus 6509 kg for the CaseIH Puma 145.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 145 or the Claas 696?
The Claas 696 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8471 kg versus 3583 kg.