AGCO RT120A vs CaseIH Puma 145
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 145 is more powerful than the AGCO RT120A: 146 HP versus 145 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 145 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the AGCO RT120A.
- The AGCO RT120A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4259 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| AGCO RT120A | CaseIH Puma 145 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 145 HP | 146 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2011 | 2011–2013 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.6 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | — | 6 509 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 18 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 259 kg | 3 583 kg |
| Wheelbase | 292 cm | 273 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the AGCO RT120A or the CaseIH Puma 145?
The CaseIH Puma 145 is more powerful than the AGCO RT120A: 146 HP versus 145 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the AGCO RT120A or the CaseIH Puma 145?
The CaseIH Puma 145 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the AGCO RT120A.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the AGCO RT120A or the CaseIH Puma 145?
The AGCO RT120A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4259 kg versus 3583 kg.