CaseIH Puma 160 vs JCB Fastrac 4160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the JCB Fastrac 4160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The JCB Fastrac 4160 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
- The JCB Fastrac 4160 is heavier: 7575 kg versus 7420 kg for the CaseIH Puma 160.
- The JCB Fastrac 4160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6000 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | JCB Fastrac 4160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2014–2024 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 7 575 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | CVT |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 000 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 297 cm |
| Length | — | 540 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the JCB Fastrac 4160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the JCB Fastrac 4160 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the JCB Fastrac 4160?
The JCB Fastrac 4160 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the JCB Fastrac 4160?
The JCB Fastrac 4160 is heavier: 7575 kg versus 7420 kg for the CaseIH Puma 160.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the JCB Fastrac 4160?
The JCB Fastrac 4160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6000 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eJCB Fastrac 4160 vs John Deere 6M 165JCB Fastrac 4160 vs John Deere 6R 165JCB Fastrac 4160 vs Landini Landpower 165JCB Fastrac 4160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460