CaseIH Puma 160 vs John Deere 4930
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the John Deere 4930 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1978 for the John Deere 4930.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | John Deere 4930 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1978–1981 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 271 cm |
| Length | — | 402 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 4930?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the John Deere 4930 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 4930?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1978 for the John Deere 4930.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-6160 vs John Deere 4930International Harvester 1486 vs John Deere 4930International Harvester 6388 vs John Deere 4930John Deere 4930 vs SAME Hercules 160