CaseIH Puma 160 vs Schluter Super 1600TVL
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Schluter Super 1600TVL deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1991 for the Schluter Super 1600TVL.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6401 kg for the Schluter Super 1600TVL.
- The Schluter Super 1600TVL offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6201 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Schluter Super 1600TVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1991–1992 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.9 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 401 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 24 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 201 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 280 cm |
| Length | — | 475 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Schluter Super 1600TVL?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Schluter Super 1600TVL deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Schluter Super 1600TVL?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1991 for the Schluter Super 1600TVL.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Schluter Super 1600TVL?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6401 kg for the Schluter Super 1600TVL.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Schluter Super 1600TVL?
The Schluter Super 1600TVL offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6201 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eHurlimann H-6165 Master vs Schluter Super 1600TVLLamborghini 165 Racing vs Schluter Super 1600TVLRenault 175-74 TZ vs Schluter Super 1600TVLSchluter Super 1600TVL vs Steyr 8180