CaseIH Puma 160 vs Ursus 1604
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Ursus 1604 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5334 kg for the Ursus 1604.
- The Ursus 1604 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4399 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Ursus 1604 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | — |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 5 334 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 12 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 4 399 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | — |
| Length | — | 508 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ursus 1604?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Ursus 1604 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ursus 1604?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5334 kg for the Ursus 1604.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Ursus 1604?
The Ursus 1604 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4399 kg versus 3583 kg.