CaseIH Puma 170 vs International Harvester A-1486
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 170 and the International Harvester A-1486 deliver the same power: 167 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1979 for the International Harvester A-1486.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6051 kg for the International Harvester A-1486.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | International Harvester A-1486 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 167 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1979–1980 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 6 051 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 266 cm |
| Length | — | 426 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester A-1486?
The CaseIH Puma 170 and the International Harvester A-1486 deliver the same power: 167 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester A-1486?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1979 for the International Harvester A-1486.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the International Harvester A-1486?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6051 kg for the International Harvester A-1486.
Other comparisons
Allis Chalmers 7045 vs International Harvester A-1486CaseIH Puma 170 vs Deutz-Fahr TTV 620CaseIH Puma 170 vs John Deere 7430 PremiumCaseIH Puma 170 vs McCormick Intl X7.670CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland T7.220International Harvester A-1486 vs John Deere 4640International Harvester A-1486 vs Müller tm17International Harvester A-1486 vs White 2-155