CaseIH Puma 170 vs JCB Fastrac 3155
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The JCB Fastrac 3155 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1998 for the JCB Fastrac 3155.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6765 kg for the JCB Fastrac 3155.
- The JCB Fastrac 3155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7001 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | JCB Fastrac 3155 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 168 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1998–2002 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 6 765 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 36 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 7 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 515 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 3155?
The JCB Fastrac 3155 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 3155?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1998 for the JCB Fastrac 3155.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 3155?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6765 kg for the JCB Fastrac 3155.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 3155?
The JCB Fastrac 3155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7001 kg versus 4626 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH CVX 170 vs JCB Fastrac 3155CaseIH Puma 170 vs Deutz-Fahr TTV 620CaseIH Puma 170 vs John Deere 7430 PremiumCaseIH Puma 170 vs McCormick Intl X7.670CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland T7.220JCB Fastrac 3155 vs Landini Legend 160JCB Fastrac 3155 vs New Holland 8670JCB Fastrac 3155 vs Renault Ares 720