CaseIH Puma 195 vs John Deere 4760
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the John Deere 4760: 195 HP versus 194 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1992 for the John Deere 4760.
- The John Deere 4760 is heavier: 8483 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 3757 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 4760 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 194 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1992–1994 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.6 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 8 483 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | 16 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 3 757 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 4760?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the John Deere 4760: 195 HP versus 194 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 4760?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1992 for the John Deere 4760.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 4760?
The John Deere 4760 is heavier: 8483 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 4760?
The CaseIH Puma 195 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 3757 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO Allis 9170 vs John Deere 4760Buhler Versatile 2145 vs CaseIH Puma 195CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX200CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX215CaseIH Puma 195 vs New Holland T7050John Deere 4760 vs Schluter Euro Trac 1900 LSJohn Deere 4760 vs Schluter Super 1900 TVL-LSJohn Deere 4760 vs Valmet 8800