CaseIH Puma 195 vs John Deere 6030
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the John Deere 6030: 195 HP versus 194 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1972 for the John Deere 6030.
- The John Deere 6030 is heavier: 8246 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 2680 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 6030 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 194 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1972–1977 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 8.7 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 8 246 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | 8 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 2 680 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 264 cm |
| Length | — | 437 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 6030?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the John Deere 6030: 195 HP versus 194 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 6030?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1972 for the John Deere 6030.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 6030?
The John Deere 6030 is heavier: 8246 kg versus 7999 kg for the CaseIH Puma 195.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the John Deere 6030?
The CaseIH Puma 195 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 2680 kg.
Other comparisons
Buhler Versatile 2145 vs CaseIH Puma 195CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX200CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX215CaseIH Puma 195 vs New Holland T7050J.I. Case 1570 vs John Deere 6030John Deere 6030 vs M-R-S A-85John Deere 6030 vs Steiger Super WildcatJohn Deere 6030 vs Steiger Super Wildcat II ST-200