CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 4840
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 200 and the John Deere 4840 deliver the same power: 200 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1978 for the John Deere 4840.
- The CaseIH Puma 200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4626 kg versus 3762 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 4840 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 HP | 200 HP |
| Production years | 2011+ | 1978–1982 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.6 L |
| Weight | 8 591 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 8 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 3 762 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 449 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the John Deere 4840?
The CaseIH Puma 200 and the John Deere 4840 deliver the same power: 200 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the John Deere 4840?
The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1978 for the John Deere 4840.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the John Deere 4840?
The CaseIH Puma 200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4626 kg versus 3762 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT165A vs CaseIH Puma 200CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 6M 200CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 7200RCaseIH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6497Fendt Favorit 620LS vs John Deere 4840International Harvester 3788 vs John Deere 4840International Harvester 6788 vs John Deere 4840J.I. Case 1570 vs John Deere 4840