AGCO RT165A vs CaseIH Puma 200
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The AGCO RT165A and the CaseIH Puma 200 deliver the same power: 200 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2007 for the AGCO RT165A.
- The CaseIH Puma 200 is heavier: 8591 kg versus 7801 kg for the AGCO RT165A.
- The AGCO RT165A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7121 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| AGCO RT165A | CaseIH Puma 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 HP | 200 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2011 | 2011+ |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 7.4 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 7 801 kg | 8 591 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 18 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 7 121 kg | 4 626 kg |
| Wheelbase | 294 cm | 288 cm |
| Length | 533 cm | — |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the AGCO RT165A or the CaseIH Puma 200?
The AGCO RT165A and the CaseIH Puma 200 deliver the same power: 200 HP.
Which is more recent, the AGCO RT165A or the CaseIH Puma 200?
The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2007 for the AGCO RT165A.
Which is heavier, the AGCO RT165A or the CaseIH Puma 200?
The CaseIH Puma 200 is heavier: 8591 kg versus 7801 kg for the AGCO RT165A.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the AGCO RT165A or the CaseIH Puma 200?
The AGCO RT165A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7121 kg versus 4626 kg.