CaseIH Puma 200 vs New Holland 8870A
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 200 and the New Holland 8870A deliver the same power: 200 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the New Holland 8870A.
- The New Holland 8870A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6718 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 200 | New Holland 8870A | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 HP | 200 HP |
| Production years | 2011+ | 2001–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.5 L |
| Weight | 8 591 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 6 718 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 538 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the New Holland 8870A?
The CaseIH Puma 200 and the New Holland 8870A deliver the same power: 200 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the New Holland 8870A?
The CaseIH Puma 200 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the New Holland 8870A.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 200 or the New Holland 8870A?
The New Holland 8870A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6718 kg versus 4626 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT165A vs CaseIH Puma 200CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 6M 200CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 7200RCaseIH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6497Challenger MT645 vs New Holland 8870ADeutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 vs New Holland 8870ADeutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 vs New Holland 8870ADeutz-Fahr Agrotron 210 vs New Holland 8870A