CaseIH Puma 240 vs Renault Atles 925
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 240 and the Renault Atles 925 deliver the same power: 240 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 240 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2000 for the Renault Atles 925.
- The Renault Atles 925 is heavier: 9661 kg versus 7620 kg for the CaseIH Puma 240.
- The Renault Atles 925 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 12002 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 240 | Renault Atles 925 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 HP | 240 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 2000–2002 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.2 L |
| Weight | 7 620 kg | 9 661 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 18 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 12 002 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 304 cm |
| Length | — | 573 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 240 or the Renault Atles 925?
The CaseIH Puma 240 and the Renault Atles 925 deliver the same power: 240 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 240 or the Renault Atles 925?
The CaseIH Puma 240 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2000 for the Renault Atles 925.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 240 or the Renault Atles 925?
The Renault Atles 925 is heavier: 9661 kg versus 7620 kg for the CaseIH Puma 240.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 240 or the Renault Atles 925?
The Renault Atles 925 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 12002 kg versus 5800 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 240 vs John Deere 6M 240CaseIH Puma 240 vs Massey Ferguson 7626CaseIH Puma 240 vs Massey Ferguson 7726CaseIH Puma 240 vs Massey Ferguson 7726SChallenger MT735 vs Renault Atles 925Massey Ferguson 5150 vs Renault Atles 925New Holland 9184 vs Renault Atles 925Renault Atles 925 vs Versatile 2240