Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 6616
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT495E and the Massey Ferguson 6616 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
- The Challenger MT495E is the more recent model: production started in 2017, versus 2014 for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
- The Challenger MT495E is heavier: 6999 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
- The Massey Ferguson 6616 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5171 kg versus 5100 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT495E | Massey Ferguson 6616 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Production years | 2017–2020 | 2014–2016 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 4.9 L |
| Weight | 6 999 kg | 5 670 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | — |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 100 kg | 5 171 kg |
| Wheelbase | 266 cm | 266 cm |
| Length | — | 469 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Challenger MT495E and the Massey Ferguson 6616 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Challenger MT495E is the more recent model: production started in 2017, versus 2014 for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Challenger MT495E is heavier: 6999 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT495E or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Massey Ferguson 6616 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5171 kg versus 5100 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 150 vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 6716SChallenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7150Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7716Challenger MT495E vs Massey Ferguson 7716SChallenger MT535D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Kubota M7-151 vs Massey Ferguson 6616