John Deere 1040 vs McCormick Intl CX50

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 1040

John Deere 1040

53 HP · 1980–1987

View full specs
McCormick Intl CX50

McCormick Intl CX50

53 HP · 2000–2004

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1040 and the McCormick Intl CX50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.
  • The McCormick Intl CX50 is the more recent model: production started in 2000, versus 1980 for the John Deere 1040.
  • The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 2770 kg for the John Deere 1040.
  • The McCormick Intl CX50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2039 kg versus 1835 kg.

Full specs comparison

John Deere 1040McCormick Intl CX50
Power53 HP53 HP
Production years1980–19872000–2004
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders33
Displacement2.9 L2.7 L
Weight2 770 kg3 235 kg
Drive2WD or 4WD2WD or 4WD
TransmissionGearShuttle
Gears (fwd/rev)8 / 416 / 8
Rear lift capacity1 835 kg2 039 kg
Wheelbase204 cm215 cm
Length350 cm406 cm
CabYesYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1040 or the McCormick Intl CX50?

The John Deere 1040 and the McCormick Intl CX50 deliver the same power: 53 HP.

Which is more recent, the John Deere 1040 or the McCormick Intl CX50?

The McCormick Intl CX50 is the more recent model: production started in 2000, versus 1980 for the John Deere 1040.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 1040 or the McCormick Intl CX50?

The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 2770 kg for the John Deere 1040.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the John Deere 1040 or the McCormick Intl CX50?

The McCormick Intl CX50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2039 kg versus 1835 kg.

Other comparisons