Massey Ferguson 384S vs McCormick-Deering Super WD-9
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 384S and the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 deliver the same power: 72 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 384S is the more recent model: production started in 1994, versus 1953 for the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9.
- The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is heavier: 3311 kg versus 2350 kg for the Massey Ferguson 384S.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 384S | McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 72 HP | 72 HP |
| Production years | 1994–1999 | 1953–1956 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.9 L | 5.7 L |
| Weight | 2 350 kg | 3 311 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Synchronized | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 4 | 5 / 1 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 600 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 207 cm | 211 cm |
| Length | 344 cm | 355 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 384S or the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9?
The Massey Ferguson 384S and the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 deliver the same power: 72 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 384S or the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9?
The Massey Ferguson 384S is the more recent model: production started in 1994, versus 1953 for the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 384S or the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9?
The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is heavier: 3311 kg versus 2350 kg for the Massey Ferguson 384S.
Other comparisons
Belarus 5160 vs Massey Ferguson 384SBelarus 5260 vs Massey Ferguson 384SBelarus 526HX vs Massey Ferguson 384SInternational Harvester TD-14 vs McCormick-Deering Super WD-9Jeep CJ-3B vs McCormick-Deering Super WD-9Long 2610 vs Massey Ferguson 384SMassey-Harris 555 vs McCormick-Deering Super WD-9McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 vs Minneapolis-Moline GB