Cub Cadet CLT-160 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet CLT-160: 64 HP versus 16 HP (+48 HP, +300%).
- The Cub Cadet CLT-160 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet CLT-160 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 16 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2004 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | — | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | — | 152 cm |
| Length | — | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | — | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet CLT-160 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet CLT-160: 64 HP versus 16 HP (+48 HP, +300%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet CLT-160 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet CLT-160 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.