Cub Cadet Tank M60 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet Tank M60: 64 HP versus 27 HP (+37 HP, +137%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 521 kg for the Cub Cadet Tank M60.
- The Cub Cadet Tank M60 has the wider mower deck: 60" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet Tank M60 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 27 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2011 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 521 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | — | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 128 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 198 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 60" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet Tank M60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet Tank M60: 64 HP versus 27 HP (+37 HP, +137%).
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet Tank M60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 521 kg for the Cub Cadet Tank M60.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet Tank M60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet Tank M60 has the wider mower deck: 60" versus 42".