Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Ford RMT 526
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Ford RMT 526: 37 HP versus 5 HP (+32 HP, +640%).
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1977 for the Ford RMT 526.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 120 kg for the Ford RMT 526.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 26".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet Tank S7237 | Ford RMT 526 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 37 HP | 5 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2012 | 1977–1980 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 2 | 1 |
| Weight | 698 kg | 120 kg |
| Drive | — | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 5 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | 137 cm | 100 cm |
| Length | 228 cm | 142 cm |
| Mower deck | 72" | 26" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford RMT 526?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Ford RMT 526: 37 HP versus 5 HP (+32 HP, +640%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford RMT 526?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1977 for the Ford RMT 526.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford RMT 526?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 120 kg for the Ford RMT 526.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford RMT 526?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 26".
Other comparisons
Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere 1565 Series IICub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere Z970ACub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MTZ 3572Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MZT 3560Ford RMT 526 vs Snapper lawn tractors 2550Ford RMT 526 vs Snapper lawn tractors 2652Ford RMT 526 vs Wheel Horse A-51Ford RMT 526 vs Wheel Horse A-60