Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo

Side-by-side specs comparison

Cub Cadet XT2 LX50

Cub Cadet XT2 LX50

23 HP · 2015–2025

View full specs
John Deere 1600 Turbo

John Deere 1600 Turbo

64 HP · 2002–2006

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50: 64 HP versus 23 HP (+41 HP, +178%).
  • The Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 226 kg for the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50.
  • The Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Full specs comparison

Cub Cadet XT2 LX50John Deere 1600 Turbo
Power23 HP64 HP
Production years2015–20252002–2006
FuelGasolineDiesel
Cylinders24
Weight226 kg1 791 kg
Drive2WD4WD
TransmissionHydrostaticHydrostatic
Wheelbase119 cm152 cm
Length172 cm335 cm
CabYes
Mower deck50"42"

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50: 64 HP versus 23 HP (+41 HP, +178%).

Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?

The Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.

Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 226 kg for the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50.

Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?

The Cub Cadet XT2 LX50 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Other comparisons