John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Scotts S1642
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts S1642: 64 HP versus 16 HP (+48 HP, +300%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1999 for the Scotts S1642.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 175 kg for the Scotts S1642.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Scotts S1642 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 16 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1999–2001 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Electric |
| Cylinders | 4 | 1 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 175 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | — |
| Length | 335 cm | 152 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S1642?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts S1642: 64 HP versus 16 HP (+48 HP, +300%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S1642?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1999 for the Scotts S1642.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S1642?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 175 kg for the Scotts S1642.