John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Wheel Horse 264
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse 264: 64 HP versus 14 HP (+50 HP, +357%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1994 for the Wheel Horse 264.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 236 kg for the Wheel Horse 264.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Wheel Horse 264 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 14 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1994–1996 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Electric |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 236 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 6 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | 125 cm |
| Length | 335 cm | 175 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse 264?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse 264: 64 HP versus 14 HP (+50 HP, +357%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse 264?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1994 for the Wheel Horse 264.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse 264?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 236 kg for the Wheel Horse 264.